Page76 | Our Words At Work | Medical | Medico-Legal

PAGE76OUR WORDS AT WORKMEDICALMEDICO-LEGAL

© [2025] Page76. All Rights Reserved.

7/24/20255 min read

INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
(Prepared for WorkCover / WorkSafe purposes)

Claimant: Mr J. L.
Date of Birth: 14 March 1984
Date of Injury: 14 January 2025
Date of Examination: 3 June 2025
Date of Report: 15 June 2025
Referral Source: M. & Partners Solicitors
Examining Practitioner: Dr S. R., MBBS, FRACGP
AHPRA Registration Number: MED0123456789
Report Purpose: WorkCover Claim – Initial Injury Assessment

1. PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT

This independent medical assessment has been requested for the purposes of a WorkCover claim. The report assesses the nature and extent of injuries sustained by Mr J. L. in the course of his employment on 14 January 2025, as well as his capacity for work and treatment requirements.

2. BACKGROUND / MECHANISM OF INJURY

Mr L. reports that on 14 January 2025, while working as a delivery coordinator for a logistics company, he was seated in his work vehicle at a red light when it was struck from behind by a third-party vehicle travelling at high speed (~60 km/h). He was wearing a seatbelt and experienced immediate neck and lower back pain.

The incident was reported to his employer and WorkCover claim documentation has been submitted.

3. CURRENT SYMPTOMS (AS REPORTED BY CLAIMANT)

  • Persistent cervical spine stiffness and discomfort

  • Lumbar pain, worsened by prolonged sitting or bending

  • Headaches localised at the base of the skull, described as tension-related

  • Difficulty sleeping due to pain and disrupted posture

  • Reduced tolerance for desk-based work

4. MEDICAL HISTORY

  • No previous history of spinal injury or chronic musculoskeletal conditions

  • No current comorbidities

  • No known allergies

  • No prior WorkCover claims

  • Non-smoker; occasional alcohol use

5. EMPLOYMENT DETAILS

Mr L. is employed full-time as a delivery coordinator. The role involves vehicle operation, moderate lifting, and prolonged computer use. He returned to work in a reduced capacity one week after the injury but continues to experience difficulty with sitting and repetitive physical tasks.

6. EXAMINATION FINDINGS

Cervical Spine:

  • Reduced range of motion (flexion and rotation to approx. 70–75%)

  • Palpable tenderness over trapezius and paraspinal muscles

  • No neurological deficits

Lumbar Spine:

  • Mild paraspinal tenderness

  • Normal posture and gait

  • Negative straight leg raise

  • Reflexes, sensation and power normal in both lower limbs

7. DIAGNOSIS

  1. Whiplash-Associated Disorder (WAD Grade II) – Cervical Spine

  2. Lumbar soft tissue strain (muscular)

These injuries are consistent with a low-to-moderate force rear-end collision and represent soft tissue trauma without evidence of radiculopathy or structural damage.

8. CAPACITY FOR WORK

Mr L. is currently fit for modified duties with restrictions including:

  • No prolonged sitting (>45 minutes without a break)

  • No repetitive lifting >5kg

  • Avoidance of bending and twisting tasks

He is not fit for full pre-injury duties at this stage. Anticipated return to full duties within 6–10 weeks with ongoing treatment.

9. TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT

Recommended:

  • Physiotherapy (manual therapy and graded exercise program)

  • Ergonomic review of workstation

  • Home-based exercise program

  • Reassess in 6–8 weeks to monitor progress

No further specialist referrals or imaging indicated at this stage.

10. PROGNOSIS

Prognosis is favourable. With appropriate conservative management, Mr L. is expected to recover fully within 3–6 months of injury. No long-term impairment anticipated.

11. CAUSATION

In my clinical opinion, the reported injuries are directly caused by the work-related motor vehicle incident of 14 January 2025. There is no evidence of prior injury or unrelated pathology.

DECLARATION

I confirm that this report is independent and impartial, and that I have no conflict of interest in this matter. I have prepared this assessment in accordance with the Guidelines for the Evaluation of Work-Related Injuries under WorkSafe Victoria protocols.

Signed:
Dr S. R.
MBBS, FRACGP
AHPRA Reg: MED0123456789
15 June 2025
Melbourne, VIC

[Word count: 603

COMCARE MEDICO-LEGAL PSYCHIATRIC REPORT
(Prepared for the purposes of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988)

Examinee: Ms R. F.
Date of Birth: 17 July 1991
Date of Examination: 4 June 2025
Date of Report: 17 June 2025
Referring Party: Mr D. C., A. Legal Group
Examining Psychiatrist: Dr M. T., MBBS, FRANZCP
AHPRA Registration: MED0123456789
Purpose: Independent Psychiatric Assessment – Comcare Claim

1. INTRODUCTION

This independent medico-legal psychiatric report has been prepared at the request of the referring solicitor in accordance with the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (SRC Act). The purpose is to evaluate whether Ms R. F. has suffered a psychiatric injury arising out of or in the course of her employment with a Commonwealth employer, the nature and severity of that injury, causation, treatment needs, and work capacity.

2. EMPLOYMENT & INCIDENT HISTORY

Ms F. commenced employment in 2018 as a Finance Officer with a Commonwealth agency (name withheld). She reports that from approximately May 2023, she began experiencing repeated workplace bullying and unreasonable management practices following a change in direct supervision. Specific allegations include:

  • Frequent public criticism and belittling

  • Unrealistic performance demands

  • Being excluded from meetings

  • Intimidating tone and verbal hostility

She attempted to report these behaviours through internal HR channels, but perceived no corrective action. She remained at work until February 2024, when her GP certified her unfit for duties due to psychological distress. A Comcare claim was lodged shortly thereafter.

3. PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY

  • No prior mental health diagnosis, treatment, or hospitalisation

  • No psychiatric medication use prior to 2024

  • No history of substance misuse

  • No significant family history of mental illness

4. PRESENTING SYMPTOMS (AT TIME OF ASSESSMENT)

Ms F. reports the following:

  • Persistent low mood and loss of interest in previously enjoyable activities

  • Generalised anxiety, with intrusive workplace-related thoughts

  • Sleep disturbance (difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep)

  • Avoidance of social and professional interactions

  • Reduced confidence, hopelessness, and feelings of worthlessness

  • Panic attacks triggered by thoughts of work or performance pressure

5. MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION

  • Appearance: Neatly dressed; appropriate grooming

  • Behaviour: Anxious, cooperative

  • Speech: Soft, slowed

  • Mood: “Flat and overwhelmed”

  • Affect: Constricted

  • Thought content: No delusions or hallucinations; passive suicidal ideation (no plan)

  • Cognition: Mild impairment in concentration

  • Insight and judgement: Intact

  • Risk: No current active risk, but heightened psychological vulnerability

6. DIAGNOSIS (DSM-5 TR)

  • F32.1 Major Depressive Disorder, Moderate

  • F41.1 Generalised Anxiety Disorder

These conditions developed secondary to workplace stressors as reported.

7. CAUSATION

Based on the information provided, clinical interview, and standard psychiatric evaluation, I am of the opinion that Ms F’s psychiatric condition arose out of and in the course of her Commonwealth employment. The temporal relationship, consistent symptom profile, and lack of any pre-existing psychiatric history support a clear causal link between her employment and her psychological injury.

8. REASONABLE MANAGEMENT ACTION

I am not aware of sufficient evidence to conclude that the employer’s conduct falls under the provisions of "reasonable administrative action carried out in a reasonable manner" (per Section 5A of the SRC Act). In my opinion, the managerial behaviours described were excessive, sustained, and psychologically injurious, and likely exceed what would be considered reasonable management.

9. TREATMENT

Current Treatment:

  • GP-led mental health care plan

  • Weekly cognitive behavioural therapy sessions

  • Sertraline 100mg daily (SSRI) commenced in March 2024

Recommended Treatment:

  • Ongoing psychological therapy with a trauma-informed focus

  • Continuation of pharmacotherapy (review after 6 weeks)

  • Psychiatric review in 3 months to evaluate need for medication adjustment

  • Structured return-to-work support program with psychological monitoring

10. WORK CAPACITY

Ms F. is currently unfit for work in any capacity.

A graded return to suitable employment (non-client-facing, low-stress, with flexibility and remote option) may be considered within 3–6 months, depending on her therapeutic progress. She is not fit to return to the same workplace or under the same supervision.

11. PROGNOSIS

With consistent treatment and workplace modification, Ms F’s prognosis is fair to good. However, full functional recovery may take 12–18 months, and her confidence in public sector roles may remain impaired. Risk of recurrence is moderate in high-stress settings or if prematurely returned to work.

12. PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT (IF REQUESTED)

A permanent impairment assessment under the Comcare Guide (PI Guide for Psychiatric Conditions) has not been conducted during this evaluation. If required, a structured PIRS assessment (Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale) can be undertaken in a follow-up appointment.

13. DECLARATION

I confirm that I have no actual or perceived conflict of interest in this matter. I have prepared this report in accordance with the Expert Witness Code of Conduct and acknowledge that my duty is to the Court, Tribunal, or instructing authority, not the party instructing me.

Signed:
Dr M. T.
MBBS, FRANZCP
Consultant Psychiatrist
AHPRA Reg: MED012345
17 June 2025
Canberra, ACT

[Word count: 782]